I love to work with family businesses on employee performance and compensation planning challenges. While family businesses desire a culture of accountability, performance and results, family relationships add a layer of relationship complexity that complicates things. One of the compensation issues family businesses face is how they deal with the issues of seniority in their compensation decisions.
I’ll be honest. I’m not a fan of seniority as a factor in most any decisions, but especially in compensation decisions. I believe that seniority was once worthy of the weight and emphasis that was once placed on it. However, as a factor in who gets paid what amount, I can no longer conceive of seniority being a reasonable factor in determining compensation.
In this age of technology advancements, global competitiveness and market reinvention, there is no longer any correlation between paying people more because they’ve been here longer and their skills or job performance.
For instance, companies send out their typing to Taiwan while technical assistance calls to computer manufacturers are being handled in India. Outsourcing may be a hot political topic, but it isn’t going to go away in the global economy. These are issues of technology and global competitiveness, not seniority.
In terms of market reinvention, ask some former travel agents, who had many years of seniority, how much their seniority helped them when consumers in droves began making their own reservations on-line. Almost overnight, the concept of working through a travel agency was gone. The reality is that the number of years of experience doesn’t mean what it used to mean in the marketplace.
So, as you make decisions this year in your family business about compensation, why should seniority not be a factor in your compensation decisions? The most basic answer is that your customers don’t care about the seniority of the employee who is helping them. Sure, customers want to deal with someone who is skilled and competent, but seniority has no correlation to the customer’s expectation to be served well by your company. If your company won’t serve them well, customers will go elsewhere without regard to the seniority of the employees.
Let me give you a recent personal example. We recently went to a very popular local family owned restaurant. While waiting to be seated I could hear one of the owners (lots of seniority) and a long time waitress (lots of seniority) sharing similar stories about waking up that morning and dreading the day ahead and looking forward to closing time. The owner then pasted on a smile, greeted us happily, but unconvincingly and walked us to our table.
Now, did I feel warm and fuzzy about how appreciated and valued I was as a customer of this restaurant? Will it make me more likely to go back again compared to the numerous other restaurant choices I have locally? And, what did seniority have to do with the level of service I received? The point is that I could just as easily have received poor service from a brand new employee for a whole host of reasons.
The notion that family members and employees who have been here the longest are the most skilled and are the best performers is obsolete. There’s an old adage that asks whether a twenty-year employee has twenty years of experience or one year of experience twenty times. I’m not saying years of experience won’t make an employee more helpful to customers. What I am saying is that the correlation is not automatic. An employee’s job performance in serving the customer will depend on their knowledge, skills, initiative, level of service, responsiveness, etc., not on how long they’ve been employed with your company. So, if your customer doesn’t consider employee seniority as an issue in their level of satisfaction with your company, why do you?
Most companies use multiple factors in determining compensation. So, what factor should be used to replace seniority as a factor in compensation decisions? The answer is skills. The key question is “How has the employee made themselves more valuable to the company than they were last year, last month, and last week?”
At performance review time, give the employee a list of skills they could learn to become more valuable. Then, tell them how their compensation will increase as they become more valuable to the organization. And, no, I’m not talking about giving them a raise every time they learn a new skill.
For instance, a new employee who works part-time will get more hours as they are cross trained in multiple positions. More hours will mean more compensation. Of course, some new skills will certainly mean a raise in their compensation. New skills make employees more valuable in the marketplace and, if you want to keep them, you’ll want to pay them competitively.
So, as the leader of your family business, take on this issue in the interest of making your family business more competitive. Make your company more competitive by using skills as a basis for compensation decisions in your organization instead of seniority. It will build accountability and encourage a focus on customer service, performance and results. It’s also a great cure for the disease of seniority.